Locked In
Scientists have shown that a patient in a persistent vegetative state can actually understand and “answer” questions. Use of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging has shown very specific brain activity in response to questioning. Activity that can be interpreted in no other way than as a response to a question. This would tend to indicate that the patient in question still maintains higher brain functions. This type of persistent vegetative state is known as being “locked in” and appears to be the type of state that may eventually recover, although this has yet to be established.
This makes the arguments for euthanasia in comatose patients that much more difficult. It is clear from this interesting experiment that our understanding of the comatose state is very limited and that brain functions in comatose people may still be present. Certainly it is dangerous to argue that a person in a long-term coma is “just a shell” or the “living dead” as the Herald puts it.
This does not mean there is no valid ground for euthanasia of comatose patients, just that the justifications now move to the more subjective area of choice. “This is not what X would have wanted”, is still a possible argument, but “X is long dead” might not.
On the other hand, from a medical viewpoint, being able to run a more definitive test to see if brain function has truly completely ceased, may make those difficult, traumatic “ventilator” decisions a little easier. It would be good if we can put death into the “beyond reasonable doubt” category in these cases.
Related posts:
- Euthanasia (Part 1) Euthanasia is a topic not unlike abortion, in that it...
- Locked Away An article in yesterday’s Dominion Post posted on Stuff caught...
- Strange Mercy The Herald carries a fairly level-headed article (from the Independent)...
- Euthanasia (Part 2) End of Life Issues I have blogged about these issues...
- Euthanasia (Part 4) Quality of Life Issues (involuntary euthanasia) Now we move into...
Feb 8 10 9:49 am
MD, It’s worth noting that (as far as I can recall) the study said that they found these responses in 17% of cases studied, so presumably the other 83% showed no reaction. I agree that this is something that should be used where possible (it may not always be available) to test those in a supposed PVS to evaluate what opportunities there may be for any ultimate recovery.
People do recover from being labeled as being in a PVS, but it is rare. I suspect this is because we don’t really know enough about the physical basis of consciousness to be certain when it is dormant or gone. For some, there is no hope, and is it ethical to maintain their bodies alive in such cases ? I believe that in the somewhat celebrated Schiavo case in the USA, a subsequent PM showed extensive brain atrophication implying that she was indeed in a genuine PVS and that a recovery was effectively impossible.