Comments on: Spam Journalism #66

By: Andrew W

Andrew W — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:24:35 +0000

I have to admit that I’d find Deming a lot more credible if he wasn’t himself such a staunchly political partisan individual.

His attacks on politically motivated supporters of AGW look like pot meet kettle.

By: Andrew W

Andrew W — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:35:29 +0000

All of the graphs you point to have the MWP as about 0.2-0.3C warmer than the LIA, and they all show the late 20th century as being warmer than the MWP.

By: JC

JC — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:40:23 +0000

You can argue that with Dr David Deming’s statement to the Senate Committee’s Environment and Public Works of 12.6.2006 where he quoted from an email saying “We have to get rid of the MWP”.

The First and Second IPCC reports have the MWP but the 2001 scrubs it in favour of Mann’s Hockey Stick.

http://epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=266543

By: Andrei

Andrei — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:36:14 +0000

You are in denial Andrew if you don’t think the climate change priesthood have not sought to “contain” the MWP.

And as for using wikipedia for a reference on anything to do with climate change – it is a waste if time because there is a little gnome who spends his life keeping anything to do with “climate change” ideologically pure. You just have to compare the IPCC report from 1991 with that of 2001 to see how successful they were.

Just check out what he has been up to today
Andrei´s last blog ..Al Gore surprises scientist

By: Andrew W

Andrew W — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:02:30 +0000

JC, the “warmers have tried to “get rid of” the Medieval Warm Period” meme is a lie, the MWP is evident in all the global and NH temperature graphs used by “warmers” covering the last thousand years.
Do you think repeating the lie a few more times will make it true, or are you just working on the principle that if you throw enough mud some of it will stick?