They Never Give Up
I see the Democrats have reintroduced the “public option” (i.e. State Health Insurance) back into their health reform bill a mere couple of weeks after being unable to get such a bill through the Senate Finance Committee. They never give up, do they? It is highly unlikely that they will keep all the Democrats on board such a bill, let alone attract sufficient Republicans.
In the meantime, the better aspects of the health reform bill are stalled. This is typical American politics. The better aspects could have gone through separately with little trouble, but are being kept in a single bill as a “sweetener”, to counteract the unpalatable taste of a public insurance option.
New Zealanders, of course, will be a bit mystified about all this. Apart from the fact that our health system is state run, we have a sole state insurance provider in the form of ACC. Most of the furor in our country comes when the government tries to let private insurers in on the action. In New Zealand, it has been argued that private insurers will take the “cream” leaving the state insurer with the hard-to-insure expensive clients, which will cost the tax payer more money. Fascinatingly, almost exactly the same line of argument has been used by Republicans to point out that the likely cost to the state will be far higher than the $800 billion currently suggested.
So why is it that in New Zealand, we think that private health insurer will make a profit muscling in on ACC’s business and in the US the insurers are saying that a state insurer is unfair competition? I think the answer lies in who is entering what. In New Zealand, private insurers are entering the market. They know the ground rules. They also know that ACC is in no position to undercut them with tax payer subsidies, particularly in the work account. In the US, the private insurers are the market. The state insurer (Medicare) has a well-defined territory. The problem is that the proposed public insurance scheme has both vastly expanded territory and a mandate to undercut the market with state subsidized premiums. It is the State entering the market and with a massive advantage. The result will be the destruction of many of the smaller insurance companies and a marked lessening of competition in the insurance marketplace. There is also absolutely nothing to stop the subsidized state insurer from eventually pricing all other insurers out of the marketplace. This is what Republicans fear – state medicine by stealth.
Knowing the Democrats, I am certain their fears are fully justified.
Related posts:
- Over My Dead Body The powerful Senate Finance committee has just voted down two...
- Obamacare Wins (Maybe) The House of Representatives has just approved Obama’s healthcare bill...
- Brute Force Having failed to convince the Republicans of the merits of...
- The Gap into Conflict You may be wondering why Republicans seem so adamantly against...
- Insurance Claim Small businesses in the US are facing sharp rises in...
Oct 27 09 12:51 pm
Meantime, that State care that has supposedly only a small segment of the total US market is still nearly half the total percentage of GDP spent on health in the US, and is expected to exceed 50% within three years (before Obamacare is considered).
The Americans have a right to be afraid
JC
Oct 27 09 4:49 pm
What most people here don’t realise is that many of the “evil insurance companies” attacked by Michael Moore et al are actually private charities, like Southern Cross. So profits aren’t actually what they’re about.
scrubone´s last blog ..Pun Time