Generational Fat
Apparently we are officially the third fattest nation on the planet. Our obesity rate is 26.5% of the population (Mexico is 30% and the US 34.3%). Australia has a rate of 21.7%, but as the Aussies haven’t updated that figure since 1999, I find it as believable as their underarm bowling skills.
Inevitably, the obesity police are out in force, with Ruth Dyson calling National “shallow and short-sighted” for cutting Labour’s precious anti-obesity programs. This is a bit of a cheek considering the rise in obesity continued unabated on Labour’s watch. Ruth is joined by Dr Robyn Toomath, the Fight the Obesity Epidemic spokeswoman who complains that National has “actually reversed minimal nutritional guidelines in schools” (how dare they!). Public health nutritionist Bronwen King adds:
“Current trends to eat more processed foods would lead to obesity and undernourishment, resulting in children unable to reach their full intellectual capacity”
Leigh Sturgiss, executive director of the Obesity Action Coalition, wants tough regulation of what can be advertised to children. Not to be outdone we have Sue “the sky is falling” Kedgley holding forth on the subject:
“Green Party Health spokeswoman Sue Kedgley said the report highlighted the “stupidity” of the Government cutting funding for nutrition programmes and scrapping regulations banning junk food in school cafeterias.”
There is only one small problem with all this agitation from lobbyists to control the nutrition of children. It is all complete nonsense, as this article on some recent research shows.
“There is a strong link in obesity between mothers and daughters and fathers and sons, but not across the gender divide, research suggests.
“A study of 226 families by Plymouth’s Peninsula Medical School found obese mothers were 10 times more likely to have obese daughters.
“For fathers and sons, there was a six-fold rise. But in both cases children of the opposite sex were not affected.
“The researchers believe the link is behavioural rather than genetic.
“Researchers said it was “highly unlikely” that genetics was playing a role in the findings as it would be unusual for them to influence children along gender lines.
“Instead, they said it was probably because of some form of “behavioural sympathy” where daughters copied the lifestyles of their mothers and sons their fathers.”
The conclusions one can draw from this are inevitable:
- The primary determinant of fat kids is not school tuck shops, poverty, ignorance of nutrition or lack of exercise – it is the size (and presumably lifestyle) of the primary role model of the child – the parent of the same gender.
- All nutritional, education and regulatory efforts aimed at children are likely to be a complete waste of time (which explains the poor results Labour had in their decade of anti-obesity campaigning). This is reinforced by the fact that, contrary to the prevailing myths, 8 out of 10 obese adults were NOT overweight children.
- The only effective anti-obesity measure will be to persuade overweight adults to change their lifestyles and lose weight. Note that I say persuade. Banning KFC will not produce slim adults – they will simply find some other comfort food.
- For persuasion to have any chance of success, we need to rid ourselves of the prevailing politically correct mollycoddling of overweight people. Fat is not OK. Fat is a damned nuisance. If you are obese, you are more likely to die of a whole host of diseases including heart disease, diabetes and, of course, swine flu. You are less likely to get an accurate diagnosis because your doctor cannot examine you through the layers of fat and most imaging techniques don’t cope very well with adipose tissue either. And if you are over 120 Kg the smaller air ambulance can’t fly you out, the ED beds will collapse and the hospital has to have expensive special beds for you. And that is just a few medical problems off the top of my head.
So let’s all stop trying to make fat people feel good about themselves, naked or otherwise. The MacDoctor is overweight. He is not big-boned. He does not have under-active glands. He does not eat like a bird (unless we are talking Ostrich). He does not engage in various mostly imaginary activities. If fact, the only thing that I have, that could be considered over-active, are my teeth. I am fat. The only person who can do anything useful about fixing this is me. And if you are overweight, you are the only one who can fix it. Not Mr Ryall. Not Ms. Dyson or Ms. Kedgeley. Just you and me.
Hat Tip: Doug Hudson
Related posts:
- Famous Fat In an interesting turn about, Professor Michael McMahon of Nuffield...
- Fighting Fat Some interesting new research shows that increasing exercise regimes at...
- Heavy Fuel So does the McDonalds fuel-meal offer promote obesity? MacDonalds are offering...
- Bullies Apparently, New Zealand has the second highest rate of bullying...
- Fat Chance of Fat Tax Apparently there is a war on obesity. Trouble is, there...
7 Comments
Leave A ReplyOne Trackback/Ping
- Blog Bits | Kiwiblog — [...] MacDoctor blogs on obesity and how an obese parent makes a child six to ten times more likely to ...
Jul 14 09 2:23 am
Bother – this means I might blame my genes for being under tall but not over wide

Homepaddock´s last blog ..Obviously obvious #2
Jul 14 09 7:44 am
So my weight is yet another thing that I can blame on my mother.
Jul 14 09 12:02 pm
I agree with the sentiments of your last paragraph, but I’m going to go a step further and say that the state should not taking an interest in obesity, or any other health matter. Think about it: what right does does a bunch of politicians have to take an interest in your waist line and tell you what to eat? The underlying assumption behind this is that the state has a duty of care when it comes to the health of the citizens, which is pernicious nanny-statism.
The UK is blighted with the same disease:
http://kiwipolemicist.wordpress.com/2009/07/12/school-food-trust-wants-to-change-the-diet-of-a-nation/
Kiwi Polemicist´s last blog ..• Update: Govt forces folic acid into bread
There is no harm in government providing resources for GPs and their practice nurse to provide for obese patients. Expensive advertising campaigns and legislation are both a waste of time and money.
Jul 14 09 1:23 pm
I think it is worth emphasising that this 3rd ranking is also a good candidate for Spam Journalism.
The most consistent result from the OECD surveys is that countries that estimate obesity rates by measuring samples- always get much higher rates than countries that depend on self-reporting.
In effect, countries like France ask a fattie if he thinks he’s obese. And if he say no, he’s not obese. Never mind that he hasn’t seen his toes since Mitterand was president.
In NZ we would measure the guy and confirm that he is indeed obese.
Also, NZ has a very localised pattern of obesity. Purge the sample of Maori and PI’ers and the cruel hard fact is that our obesity rates drop dramatically.
Chthoniid´s last blog ..Photo of me
Your point about NZ position on the “fat table” is true. We are one of the few countries with accurate statistics. There is no doubt, however, that we have a lot of fat people in our society
Jul 14 09 1:39 pm
We all tend to miss the quid pro quo of electing a Govt. When it assures us we will be looked after in health and old age the “quo” is that it will demand we do what it tells us in our diets and other unsafe behaviour.
There are consequences from voting decades of welfare statists into power.. including loss of market signals that being fat etc will put up your private insurer premiums.
Its simple enough, if we contract our personal responsibility for health to the Govt then we perforce play by its rules.. whether sensible or not.
JC
You don’t have the ‘flu do you, JC? There are a lot of flying pigs in your comment…
Jul 14 09 2:12 pm
Another argument for natural selection
Jul 14 09 6:15 pm
I take your overall point (i.e. work on the parents’ lifestyle, not the children, if you want to reduce obesity) but I can make this point:
The primary determinant of fat kids is not school tuck shops, poverty, ignorance of nutrition or lack of exercise – it is the size (and presumably lifestyle) of the primary role model of the child – the parent of the same gender.
stack up with this point:
… This is reinforced by the fact that, contrary to the prevailing myths, 8 out of 10 obese adults were NOT overweight children.
Something to the effect that there are many more obese adults (proportionally) than there are obese children (proportionally), and that the “cause” of adult obesity is usually not childhood obesity, but some behaviour acquired as an adult?
Deborah´s last blog ..Friday Feminist – Mary Wollstonecraft (5)
Fat parents cause fat kids, but fat kids do not cause fat adults. Targeting children with an “anti-fat” message is therefore likely to be a waste of time.